sophiaserpentia: (Default)
[personal profile] sophiaserpentia
Okay, in the last month alone, this man has:


I can't unequivocally back him until he moves a little closer on GLBT rights and makes his position on domestic spying more clear, but he's starting to look like a real candidate here. Democratic straw polls are beginning to reflect this.  He is also the only governor running on the Democratic side, which is a big deal.  He's more clearly qualified on foreign policy than anyone else running, having been US Ambassador to the UN.  And, he announced his candidacy on Jon Stewart's program, how cool is that?

Date: 2007-04-11 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gentlemaitresse.livejournal.com
Announced that he would pull all US troops out of Iraq (a pledge so far avoided by all of the mainstream candidates for president)

How is Congressman Ron Paul, Republican, not a mainstream candidate for president?

Date: 2007-04-11 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lassiter.livejournal.com

Because, like Dennis Kucinich on the Democrats' side, he isn't "mainstream" unless the four corporations that control the "mainstream media" say he is.


Date: 2007-04-12 01:40 pm (UTC)
ineffabelle: (sophiethought)
From: [personal profile] ineffabelle
Bingo!

Date: 2007-04-11 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
Well, the standard i'm using is sizeable support in various polls. I've not seen sizeable support for Ron Paul in Republican straw polls.

Date: 2007-04-11 11:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lassiter.livejournal.com

And without any real news/media coverage of his candidacy, campaign events, soundbites, etc., you won't.

Date: 2007-04-11 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neitherday.livejournal.com
He's pretty much along side Clinton and Obama on GLBT issues. All three are for allowing queer folk in the military and for hate crime laws. All three are pro-civil union and anti-marriage. And after 2 terms of Bush, I'd settle for someone who simply isn't aggressively hostile towards GLBT folk.

Date: 2007-04-11 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumbunny.livejournal.com
Not to mention the fact that he looks like a member from South Park.

Date: 2007-04-11 09:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
He probably will have Don Imus' endorsement
that should help some I guess.

Date: 2007-04-11 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
Hehehe! I'm sure that will play well in middle America, as long as Don Imus doesn't call him a "fat sissy" again.

Date: 2007-04-11 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
youve followed the current brouhaha
about 'nappy headed hos', yes?
or maybe its only a new york area thing?
its a terrible thing to admit but I hope
Imus survives though I think he is
a thug and a bully. seems like people like him
and his brother and McGurk
are part of the balance of things...

Date: 2007-04-12 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
Oh, yes, i've been following that. Can't say i personally much favor maintaining that balance if it means keeping the Imus/Savage/Coulter croud around, unless there's even worse waiting in the wings...

Date: 2007-04-12 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
I know the other two only by reputation
but I think they are conservatives which
Imus really is not is he? more of a libertarian
democrat I should think no?
I only am more aware of him because I listen to
wfan on my car radio and the sports doesnt
begin until 10...

Date: 2007-04-12 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
The other two are conservatives, but i lump them together because they are in many ways the same brand of scoffing bully, something one of any political persuation is capable of becoming, given the inclination and the lack of accountability that seems to plague the airwaves. Though, i am reading now that Imus' simulcast is being pulled by MSNBC, maybe there will start to be accountability at last?

Date: 2007-04-12 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
well it is accountability to money a cynic would
say. I am happy to see him go down but not
happy for any loss of freedom...its a crazy old
world and all problematics are contaminated etc
gnight.+S

Date: 2007-04-12 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
It depends on what you think freedom is freedom from. On one level, it's important to establish our nation as a culture where people are free from thugs and bullies. Accountability is a crucial part of that.

With regards to freedom of speech, one could argue that verbal bullies like Imus, et al., are threats to that freedom as well. If we have a national climate where disadvantaged people do not feel safe enough to speak up, because they are being bullied on all sides, then we are sacrificing their speech. We only have freedom of speech if everyone feels free to speak. An episode like this gives us an opportunity to ponder what discourse should look like.

lenny?

Date: 2007-04-12 02:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
yeah. it's tough. freedom of speech does
not include freedom to shout fire in a
crowded theatre.
my thing is how is he different except in
being less funny by a world, from lenny
bruce? he is I think legitimately an
outsider and he uses street/outsider
talk within the general culture and people
find it funny that someone can talk like
that in public. and thats what he does.
Its what Lenny did.
I dunno. I guess I tend to the underdog
too psychologically if thats the word so
now he's down maybe feel it differently
from when he is preempting the morning
hour from the sports talk I like...
but thats my question, will it make another
lenny bruce less possible etc..
the etc because the question trails off in
several directions probably
I have no way to tie up loose ends just thinking
aloud with you.
+Seraphim

Lenny?

Date: 2007-04-12 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seraphimsigrist.livejournal.com
yeah. it's tough. freedom of speech does
not include freedom to shout fire in a
crowded theatre.
my thing is how is he different except in
being less funny by a world, from lenny
bruce? he is I think legitimately an
outsider and he uses street/outsider
talk within the general culture and people
find it funny that someone can talk like
that in public. and thats what he does.
Its what Lenny did.
I dunno. I guess I tend to the underdog
too psychologically if thats the word so
now he's down maybe feel it differently
from when he is preempting the morning
hour from the sports talk I like...
but thats my question, will it make another
lenny bruce less possible etc..
the etc because the question trails off in
several directions probably
I have no way to tie up loose ends just thinking
aloud with you.
+Seraphim

Re: Lenny?

Date: 2007-04-12 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
I think we (as a society) will always make room for Lenny Bruce. It's a matter of finding balance between freedom of speech and freedom from meanness. It's not so much the vulgarity that people object to in shock jocks, its their meanness. There are far more vulgar acts around which appear to be in little danger of being cancelled or censored (South Park, for example).

Is he against Nuclear Power?

Date: 2007-04-11 10:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alobar.livejournal.com
"Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Barack Obama (D-Ill.)
and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) - all presidential
candidates - support legislation that would cap
greenhouse gas emissions and provide incentives to
power companies to build more nuclear plants."

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/09/399/

Re: Is he against Nuclear Power?

Date: 2007-04-12 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
Well, i can't find any statement of his in favor of expanding nuclear energy, he talks a lot about renewable sources.
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com/newsroom/energy_speech_to_bear_sterns

Maybe he'd rather not mention nuclear energy, lest people remember the trouble he had when he was the Energy Secretary under Bill Clinton.

Bill Richardson...

Date: 2007-04-11 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publius-aelius.livejournal.com
...is a potential VICE Presidential candidate, but not a Presidential one; he has a lesser capacity for raising money and, were he to be the Dems Presidential candidate, some former employees who are female and who allege "sexual harassment" would start coming out of the woodwork. We want to win in November 2008, and not to be "swiftboated" again.

Re: Bill Richardson...

Date: 2007-04-11 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lassiter.livejournal.com

I suspect Kerry's 2004 advocacy of a massive troop increase in Iraq, and his call for mandatory national service for all 18-year-olds cost him more votes than any "swiftboating" operation did.
ineffabelle: (contemplative)
From: [personal profile] ineffabelle
but in the long run it's pretty dangerous to maintain this sort of thinking... it's the trap of the context of no context...
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
Well... context or otherwise, it is an important indicator of character. I'm inclined to think it's important if a person does not respect the personal boundaries of people around him.
ineffabelle: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ineffabelle
I agree.

I'm just talking about judging "electability" that way... it becomes a sort of loop of self fulfilling prophecies, generated by the media...

Re: Bill Richardson...

Date: 2007-04-12 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
I see what you mean. This did not make national press, but if Richardson's numbers keep going up, it certainly will. This is not a tendency that Democrats will be eager to see in another president.

Profile

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 01:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios