sophiaserpentia (
sophiaserpentia) wrote2007-04-11 04:49 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
the dark horse: bill richardson
Okay, in the last month alone, this man has:
I can't unequivocally back him until he moves a little closer on GLBT rights and makes his position on domestic spying more clear, but he's starting to look like a real candidate here. Democratic straw polls are beginning to reflect this. He is also the only governor running on the Democratic side, which is a big deal. He's more clearly qualified on foreign policy than anyone else running, having been US Ambassador to the UN. And, he announced his candidacy on Jon Stewart's program, how cool is that?
- Legalized medical marijuana in New Mexico
- Helped broker a deal with North Korea so they will re-allow nuclear weapons inspectors
- While making that deal, he also arranged the return of the remains of several American POW/MIA soldiers from the Korean War
- Banned cockfights in New Mexico
- Announced that he would pull all US troops out of Iraq (a pledge so far avoided by all of the mainstream candidates for president)
I can't unequivocally back him until he moves a little closer on GLBT rights and makes his position on domestic spying more clear, but he's starting to look like a real candidate here. Democratic straw polls are beginning to reflect this. He is also the only governor running on the Democratic side, which is a big deal. He's more clearly qualified on foreign policy than anyone else running, having been US Ambassador to the UN. And, he announced his candidacy on Jon Stewart's program, how cool is that?
no subject
How is Congressman Ron Paul, Republican, not a mainstream candidate for president?
no subject
Because, like Dennis Kucinich on the Democrats' side, he isn't "mainstream" unless the four corporations that control the "mainstream media" say he is.
no subject
no subject
no subject
And without any real news/media coverage of his candidacy, campaign events, soundbites, etc., you won't.
no subject
no subject
no subject
that should help some I guess.
no subject
no subject
about 'nappy headed hos', yes?
or maybe its only a new york area thing?
its a terrible thing to admit but I hope
Imus survives though I think he is
a thug and a bully. seems like people like him
and his brother and McGurk
are part of the balance of things...
no subject
no subject
but I think they are conservatives which
Imus really is not is he? more of a libertarian
democrat I should think no?
I only am more aware of him because I listen to
wfan on my car radio and the sports doesnt
begin until 10...
no subject
no subject
say. I am happy to see him go down but not
happy for any loss of freedom...its a crazy old
world and all problematics are contaminated etc
gnight.+S
no subject
With regards to freedom of speech, one could argue that verbal bullies like Imus, et al., are threats to that freedom as well. If we have a national climate where disadvantaged people do not feel safe enough to speak up, because they are being bullied on all sides, then we are sacrificing their speech. We only have freedom of speech if everyone feels free to speak. An episode like this gives us an opportunity to ponder what discourse should look like.
lenny?
not include freedom to shout fire in a
crowded theatre.
my thing is how is he different except in
being less funny by a world, from lenny
bruce? he is I think legitimately an
outsider and he uses street/outsider
talk within the general culture and people
find it funny that someone can talk like
that in public. and thats what he does.
Its what Lenny did.
I dunno. I guess I tend to the underdog
too psychologically if thats the word so
now he's down maybe feel it differently
from when he is preempting the morning
hour from the sports talk I like...
but thats my question, will it make another
lenny bruce less possible etc..
the etc because the question trails off in
several directions probably
I have no way to tie up loose ends just thinking
aloud with you.
+Seraphim
Lenny?
not include freedom to shout fire in a
crowded theatre.
my thing is how is he different except in
being less funny by a world, from lenny
bruce? he is I think legitimately an
outsider and he uses street/outsider
talk within the general culture and people
find it funny that someone can talk like
that in public. and thats what he does.
Its what Lenny did.
I dunno. I guess I tend to the underdog
too psychologically if thats the word so
now he's down maybe feel it differently
from when he is preempting the morning
hour from the sports talk I like...
but thats my question, will it make another
lenny bruce less possible etc..
the etc because the question trails off in
several directions probably
I have no way to tie up loose ends just thinking
aloud with you.
+Seraphim
Re: Lenny?
Is he against Nuclear Power?
and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) - all presidential
candidates - support legislation that would cap
greenhouse gas emissions and provide incentives to
power companies to build more nuclear plants."
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/09/399/
Re: Is he against Nuclear Power?
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com/newsroom/energy_speech_to_bear_sterns
Maybe he'd rather not mention nuclear energy, lest people remember the trouble he had when he was the Energy Secretary under Bill Clinton.
Bill Richardson...
Re: Bill Richardson...
I suspect Kerry's 2004 advocacy of a massive troop increase in Iraq, and his call for mandatory national service for all 18-year-olds cost him more votes than any "swiftboating" operation did.
that's how politics works in general these days...
Re: that's how politics works in general these days...
Re: that's how politics works in general these days...
I'm just talking about judging "electability" that way... it becomes a sort of loop of self fulfilling prophecies, generated by the media...
Re: Bill Richardson...