sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] heeroluva at "Suspicious comments" and "Spam comments": LJ decision to 'block' spam is a big FAIL!
So I've been noticing in both my own journal and communities that I haven't been able to see some comments even thought it says there are more comments there than are actually showing up. Instead I'm getting a place holder that says (Spam comment) or (Suspicious comment).

Why are these showing up like this you may ask? In their rush to fight spam LJ has created a new filter that're AUTOMATICALLY TURNED ON in ALL journals and communities, which screens comments that are made with 'suspicious links' ie links that are not on their safe whitelist, so pretty much the majority of the internet. There is no noted way to add to the 'whitelist'.

What really gets me is that they didn't inform people that they were doing this until a week after it was done and that it was automatically turned on.

So how do I turn it off you might ask.

That's simple. Go to your Settings, click on the Privacy tab, and half way down where it says Spam Protection uncheck the box next to "Comments containing a link to a non-whitelisted domain will be marked as spam and moved to a special section." This applies to both personal journal and communities and the opinion has to be manually changed in each one.

While I understand how this could be a good idea, I think they went about it in a very backhanded way, and have implemented it poorly. There was no message to anyone that the link has been screened. It's automatically done. This went on for over a week before they said anything about it. There is still nothing in the FAQs about it even. The only way I found out about this way going through the support pages where people were reporting similar issues.

Please share this!



ETA: This links really illustrates the problems.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
I'm happy to continue reading your posts if you crosspost them here (and I hope you will) but I do not have plans at present to set up an account there, so I am unable to offer any feedback if commenting is closed here.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)


This is a screenshot from my Yahoo inbox.

You all remember, I'm sure, when Snap Shots started popping up on links in LJ posts. This is like that, only more evil, because Yahoo chooses all on its own to make mouseover links out of words and phrases in emails. So if I make the mistake of mousing over one while reading, this evil bugger pops up and I have to close it just to keep reading my email. So I have a world of hate for these "helpful" overlays.

I've been trying with Firebug to isolate the precise script or frame to block to make these go away forever, without success. Anyone know?

ETA. The filter you can add to AdBlock Plus to get rid of similar overlay frames and mouseover links in Yahoo news stories is "konalayer.swf".

Son of ETA. I found the solution and it's easier than I expected -- you go to general options and de-select everything under "shortcuts" and click save. I suppose I'll let this be a lesson to me: check the user options page before going immediately to the hacker-type solutions. I'm just so used to sites having annoying "features" that I didn't even think it could just be disabled by unchecking a checkbox.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
A week ago I put in a support request about poor performance on LiveJournal. So far there's been no satisfactory resolution. Does anyone know a way I can force an escalation of some sort? Performance on this site has been abysmal for me (and apparently for the whole Steaksauce Weaksauce cluster) the last two weeks.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
For those who have not already seen, lj-toys.com has been hacked and is now adding malicious code to people's journal entries.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Godwin's Law: As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.

Godwin's Law, expanded: As an internet discussion thread grows longer, the probability of the following approaches 1:
  • a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler
  • a reference to Godwin's Law


Godwin's Law, expanded, 2009 edition: As an internet discussion thread grows longer, the probability of the following approaches 1:
  • a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler
  • a reference to Godwin's Law
  • a LOLCAT
  • a Monty Python quote
  • a proclamation that someone has "won the internet"
  • a .gif of Michael Jackson eating popcorn (from the "Thriller" video)
  • someone exclaiming that they just lost "the Game"
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
OK, Facebook accepted me. Here I am. I know a bunch of you are probably already in my "you may know this person" list, but I don't, as it turns out, know a lot of your real names. So let me know who you are or send me a friend request if you want to connect to me over there.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
I've been noticing that a lot of people who have been long-time readers of my journal have been unfriending me, so i decided to look at my journal as if seeing it for the first time... and dang, i haven't written about anything interesting in months.

Part of the problem is that i hate repeating myself, and i have blah blah blahed at grrrrrreat length on religion and politics. Anything i write these days which is halfway profound consists to an alarming degree of links to previous posts. I've already made that point, why repeat it? And more and more, silence just feels like the wisest commentary i have to offer on things. Half the time i feel like all that's left to do now is cheer as the great religious and hegemonic institutions of the past and present crumble one by one, and mumble with an air of cranky self-righteous vindication. And what's the fun in reading that?

My journal hasn't been fun or innovative or creative in probably half a year. The fun, innovative, creative part of my brain has been in restful hibernation while it ruminates the next stage of my visionary evolution. It's not a rut i'm in, i swear.

Actually that kind of expression has been a cyclical thing in my life. I have periods of creativeness followed by a season of fallow, towards the end of which i flip through the pages of crackpot notes i kept during the last outburst, marvel that such thoughts were ever uttered by moi; and then slowly, the creaky old joints get moving again. Like the Tinman, with his can of oil just an arm's length away, but his arm's immobile.

I haven't written any fiction since November. I haven't made any music in years. Time to kick myself in the ass a little.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Alright, i haven't done anything about twitter posts, even though i think they are ugly as hell. One post a day, i can scroll past it. But starting Monday i will remove people from my default view for making a separate Blip.fm post for every song they listen to. That's when it rises to the level of spam.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Pet peeve of the day: referring to posts or entries as "blogs" or "diaries" instead of "blog entries" or "diary posts," e.g. "I like that blog you posted today."

It seems this is becoming the standard usage so i'll probably have to get over myself, but in the meantime, i'll grumble in a curmudgeonly manner.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
It's okay to stop Rickrolling people now.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Hey, how about this? It is no longer possible to create a basic LJ account. Now, you either pay or see ads.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
So i'm seeing more and more links on LJ which include Snap Shots. These serve no discernible purpose other than bling. It's not like the preview you get of the page in question is readable, or is going to make any difference in whether or not you click the link. In fact, i find they slow me down, because they make me pause before clicking a link i was going to use.

[Poll #1081038]
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
I'm still here. As i wrote last week, i just haven't felt like i have anything new to say. All the news is SSDD, there's nothing new to say about any of it. My philosophical views have not progressed or evolved in the last month. No topic has grabbed my attention long enough to be worthy of a rant. And my personal life... well, remains private, mostly.

I have toyed with the idea of writing a post about how much i have to shut down my meta-Marxian sensibilities to play video games like Civilization or The Sims, but i couldn't muster enough interest to write it.

So what have i been up to? Dealing with lingering stress from the move and a long commute to pick up the kid at day camp every day. My creative attention has gone towards WoW fanfic and RP, and plot work and conceptualization for my novel, which is finally starting to shape up. I've had a hot date or two as well. ;)

I did see Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix with [livejournal.com profile] cowgrrl last weekend. I quite liked it, much more than the last movie. It felt less "by the numbers" to me.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
When i'm publically quiet in my journal, it's because i've reached a point where i've said pretty much everything i want to say. A lot of times lately i've started to write posts about one thing or another but stopped before posting, realizing i'd said it all before. At some point i'll think of something new, but in general, i don't like repeating myself.

The people in my new neighborhood don't give me weird stares. It finally dawned on me last night why.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
I can't see my friend's page or my own journal, but i can see the main page and even the "edit entry" screen. Does anyone know what's going on? Is this an S2 problem? This went on for half the day yesterday and i'm tired of this.

If i had spent $150 for a permanent account i'd be really ticked off right about now...

ETA: On the Support Page i see several people from the same cluster (Steaksauce) reporting the same problem.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
So, LJ is having another round of Permanent LJ Account sales.

To those who bought a permanent account in 2005: Was it worth it?

To everyone else: Are you tempted? I confess i am.

To those not tempted: Would a lower price do it?

To everyone: Do you think LiveJournal will still be around in 2014, when the $150 price tag will start to pay for itself?
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
After being invited to do so, i've set up a blog at Transadvocate. Via the magic of RSS i am going to set it up so that my posts there mirror over here. You can also follow it at [livejournal.com profile] sabrinastar but if i can get the crossposting to work it will probably look better over here.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Supposedly Dailykos is all the shizzle in the blogosphere.  But i took this off my del.icio.us page after maybe a week, because it's just too jumbled and chaotic for me.  (It doesn't help that Markos has a penchant for being a clueless twit.)  The way it's laid out just kind of assaults my mind, i don't know if i can describe the dissonance i experience looking at their page any more clearly than that.

I find out that the average readership of Dailykos is much younger than me, and i think about the similar problems i have with Myspace, which is also popular among a much younger crowd than me.  And i wonder, is there some kind of generational brain-wiring difference going on here?

Maybe my attention-focusing faculty works differently or something.  I like to submerge myself mentally and experientially in what i'm doing, and i HATE to be distracted.  I've always been a bit overstimulation-averse.

One thing about Myspace and Dkos is that the main text takes up less than half the screen.  And this means my eyes have to travel all over the damn place to figure out what goes where, and it's too much work.

Maybe it's the same difference that makes me despise instant messaging and rebel against even having my cell phone turned on most of the time: a neural intolerance for instantaneous multi-thread distraction.  I am capable of changing my train of thought on a moment's notice, but i really don't like to.  I particularly loathe the implication of instant messaging, that my own trains of thought will always take a back seat to the whim of half a dozen horny net geeks who swoop in to ask for sexual favors while i'm trying to plot my novel or think Deep Thoughts.

It doesn't matter that there are settings to make me visible only to a select few people.  No offense, but i don't want to be bothered by a IM from anyone, even any of you.  It's nothing personal.  Getting an IM makes me want to rip out my hair, even if it's from someone i like.  I know i am socially hobbling myself, but it's for my own sanity.  I'm just can't be any more plugged in; i'm too linear for it.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
The other day i posted this link to a video of the Mooninite guys refusing to talk to the press about anything other than haircuts. There's a lot to learn from this, not from what they're saying but from what this event represents on several levels.

The first is the nature of advertising in the future. The 'paid spot' in media presentations -- commercials during TV programs and ads in magazines and newspapers and on billboards, and that sort of thing -- is becoming a thing of the past. They'll still be there in abundance, of course, but mostly as reinforcement more than anything else. The thing is, they just aren't effective anymore; we go around them on TiVo and simply ignore them when we can.

What advertisers want now is to embed their message into the viral information networks of the internet, into the culture itself, so that you cannot have a cultural experience or interchange without receiving a paid advertising message. They've already been doing product placements in movies, TV shows, and video games for some time now. And now, i've seen the future and the future is 'guerrila marketing.'

See, for advertisers the holy grail is getting their product widely seen as 'cool.'

In fact, i've been pondering the nature of what it means for a person or thing to be 'cool' or 'not cool' for quite a while, and i keep coming back to the relationship between popular culture and advertising. Most attempts to brand a product as cool are just darn predictable: a cartoon character with sunglasses and a leather jacket telling kids to buy a particular brand of cereal, that sort of thing. Every now and then, though, an advertiser hits paydirt and product awareness takes on a life of its own. When this happens, the promoter just has to sit back and watch consumers gleefully do their product placement for them. If people are posting in Myspace and YouTube and Livejournal about how great and cool they think a product is, their work is done.

By that measure, the success of this Mooninite thing in Boston is immeasurable.

The other thing i saw in that video was the first stirrings of a new form of dissent against the news media. I don't know if it was a genuine display of youthful rebellion or whether it was a contrived attempt to simulate youth rebellion (i kinda lean towards the latter) but either way i sense a large and growing current of discontent and distrust among young people for the mass news media.

And who can frickin' blame them? The news media are polished, professional manipulators and liars. Anyone who has ever been to an event -- especially a protest -- and then watched news coverage of the event afterwards knows what i mean. They've been spouting crap for years, and in the name of "getting both sides of a story" have been lending credence to discredited ideas that otherwise would have died out years ago, like Intelligent Design and global warming doubt.  The news media rely on the fiction that they are without agenda, when a critical examination of their viewpoint shows a distinct tendency to reinforce the corporatist, classist, white supremacist agenda.

The thing is, nothing happens very far from a blog these days. People who witness or experience events firsthand are writing in their blogs about it -- or, even more impressively, posting cellphone video of it -- and this news spreads virally. Speaking from direct experience brings a dimension of meaning lost in accounts by the news media. The Mooninite guys didn't need sympathetic coverage by the news media (you can clearly hear threats from reporters of unfavorable coverage if they didn't take the conference 'more seriously,' by which they meant, going along with the reporters' script) because they knew every kid with a Myspace was going to post a link to the video -- and that THIS form of information exchange is what really counts these days.

There is always a place for objective coverage, but we are finally balancing this out with a much needed infusion of subjectivity. (For the record, i wouldn't want only subjective news to spread either, but we've really needed this.)

Profile

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 05:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios