sophiaserpentia: (Default)
President Bush signed his first veto today: he vetoed a bill funding stem cell research.

Why is it even a debate? We have these microscopic clumps of undifferentiated cells, and we are supposed to buy that some people's interpretation of ancient mythology means that the "sanctity" of these cells comes before research that could stave off or end the suffering of hundreds of millions of people from cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, spinal cord injury, and so on.

If these clumps of cells have "souls," then they can join in heaven the souls of millions of other clumps of cells that never make it to birth -- the 50-80% of all fertilized human eggs which are naturally aborted before they even become fetuses. The way i figure it, heaven will be primarily populated by the souls of clumps of cells. Should we rail against a god who sees fit to throw away so many 'babies'?

On one side of this "debate" we have science, medicine, reason, and compassion, and on the other side, we have... fundamentalist ancient mythology. This is so utterly absurd, so completely unreal, that i can only conclude that the powers that be, the rulers of our empire, are using this absurdity to drive home the absolute nature of their power. It is an arrogant capriciousness, like Roman Emperor Caligula ordering his assembled armies to collect seashells instead of invading Brittain.

In the meantime, you or someone you know or have known, are ill, are suffering, are maybe dying, and are praying for a cure which just became more distant.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
So, yesterday the mass media was very amused by video of the President speaking with his mouth full of food and candidly using an expletive, heard over a mike he didn't know was on. "Teeheehee! He said 'shit.'"

Cenk Uygur mentions this part of the conversation which did not make it to the mass media:

Bush: "Gotta go home. Got something to do tonight. Go to the airport, get on the airplane and go home. [to Chinese President Hu Jintao] How about you? Where are you going? Home? This is your neighborhood. It doesn't take you long to get home. How long does it take you to get home?"

(Reply is inaudible.)

Bush: "Eight hours? Me too. Russia's a big country and you're a big country." [to someone else] "It takes him eight hours to fly home." [to a server] "No, Diet Coke, Diet Coke." [back to second person] "It takes him eight hours to fly home. Eight hours. Russia's big and so is China."


Uygur describes this as third-grade dialogue, but with all due respect to third-graders, i live with a fourth-grader and his dialogue a year ago was much more intelligent than this.

"Russia is big and so is China." Wow, really? I never knew.

There is a whole industry dedicated to disseminating "Bushisms" -- the "OMG how funny" slips of the tongue President Bush makes on a regular basis. Some of these are... huh, just read them.

Maybe he has a speech impediment or learning disability or something, in which case, you know, i want to be sensitive. Maybe he has a nervous condition when speaking in front of audiences and it's unfair to judge him based on his public speaking. Goodness knows, lots of people would freak out in front of a microphone.

Okay, sensitivity disclaimers aside... for Christ's sake, has there ever been anyone in the White House so utterly inarticulate? Dan Quayle looks like freaking Einstein in comparison. Bill Clinton, for all his voluminous ethical lapses, could talk. He could, as they say, sell snow to an Eskimo.

And now i see this, from a couple of you: pictures of President Bush giving German Chancellor Angela Merkel an uninvited shoulder massage. In the last photograph, he looks dumbfounded, as if he is completely surprised that a serious interpersonal boundary violation like this should draw any negativity. "Hey, he was trying to do something nice!"
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
The office of Vice President Dick Cheney routinely reviews pieces of legislation before they reach the president's desk, searching for provisions that Cheney believes would infringe on presidential power, according to former White House and Justice Department officials.

The officials said Cheney's legal adviser and chief of staff, David Addington, is the Bush administration's leading architect of the "signing statements" the president has appended to more than 750 laws. The statements assert the president's right to ignore the laws because they conflict with his interpretation of the Constitution.

The Bush-Cheney administration has used such statements to claim for itself the option of bypassing a ban on torture, oversight provisions in the USA Patriot Act, and numerous requirements that they provide certain information to Congress, among other laws.

Previous vice presidents have had neither the authority nor the interest in reviewing legislation. But Cheney has used his power over the administration's legal team to promote an expansive theory of presidential authority. Using signing statements, the administration has challenged more laws than all previous administrations combined.

from Cheney aide is screening legislation: Adviser seeks to protect Bush power

Profile

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 07:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios