sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Scholars studying military personnel policy have found a controversial regulation halting the discharge of gay soldiers in units that are about to be mobilized. The document is significant because of longstanding Pentagon denials that the military requires gays to serve during wartime, only to fire them once peacetime returns. According to the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, gays and lesbians must be discharged whether or not the country is at war.

...Gay soldiers and legal groups have reported for years that known gays are sent into combat, and then discharged when the conflicts end. Discharge statistics corroborate a pattern of rising expulsions during peacetime and plummeting rates during military conflicts, and Pentagon statistics confirm that, as has been the case in every war since World War II, gay discharges have declined during the current conflict in the Middle East.

...[A] May, 2005 study by the Congressional Research Service says that although gay discharges do decline during wartime, the decrease is the result of "random fluctuations in the data," not an intentional Pentagon policy of retaining gays during wars ["Homosexuals and U.S. Military Policy: Current Issues," p. 12].

from RESEARCHERS LOCATE ARMY DOCUMENT ORDERING COMMANDERS NOT TO FIRE GAYS
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Bleat the horns! Encourage your sons -- oh, and I guess your daughters too, though we'd prefer they stay home to make babies -- to join the imperial army!

Oh, and by all means, don't tell the actual truth about war. And if you do happen to mention that people sometimes get killed in war, by all means, don't tell the truth about THIS particular war, in which so far 1750 Americans and 25,000 innocent Iraqi civilians have been killed.

Especially if you are a member of this nation's empire's governing body, who might be interested in getting to hear some truth about 9/11, the WMDs that never really existed, the link between Saddam and Osama that never really existed, and the facts which seem to have been fixed around the policy.

Several Senate Republicans denounced other lawmakers and the news media on Thursday for unfavorable depictions of the Iraq war and the Pentagon urged members of Congress to talk up military service to help ease a recruiting shortfall.

Families are discouraging young men and women from enlisting "because of all the negative media that's out there," Sen. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, said at a U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. Inhofe also said that other senators' criticism of the war contributed to the propaganda of U.S. enemies. He did not name the senators.

Army Chief of Staff Peter Schoomaker urged members of Congress to use "your considerable influence to explain to the American people and to those that are influencers out there how important it is for our young people to serve this nation at a time like this." The Army on Wednesday said it was 14 percent, or about 7,800 recruits, behind its year-to-date recruitment target even though it exceeded its monthly target in June. With extended deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan, recruiting also is down for the National Guard and the Reserves.

"With the deluge of negative news that we get daily, it's just amazing to me that anybody would want to sign up," said Sen. Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican.

Facing flagging support for the Iraq war that has killed about 1,750 U.S. forces,President Bush in a speech on Tuesday acknowledged the nation's doubts about the strategy but insisted the operation was worthwhile and portrayed Iraq as a key battlefield against terrorists. Bush himself made a pitch for military service. "We live in freedom because every generation has produced patriots willing to serve a cause greater than themselves. Those who serve today are taking their rightful place among the greatest generations that have worn our nation's uniform," he said.

from Army recruits shortfall blamed on Iraq war critics


So, right, it's the media and the critics who are to blame, not, oh, the lying chickenhawks who started the war, or the people with guns and bombs actually killing people. Oh, no, they're not the ones to blame -- it's those... those unpatriotic critics. And don't consider for a moment that the lower-class, mostly minority, lack-of-career-prospect-having young men and women being targeted by massive army propaganda campaigns and flag-waving might be able to put together the truth for themselves, especially when they look at what is happening to the Iraqi people and have some idea of what it feels like to be oppressed. Maybe they don't like having to choose between McDonalds or having their jaw blown off by a car-bomb attack.

Suddenly, now, you're a threat if you ask honest questions or speak the truth. Since when have truth and honesty ever been a threat to democracy? Only when deceit and greed are running the show.

Edit to add this tidbit from an opinion piece in USAToday:

Last fall, Charles Moskos of Northwestern University, a prominent expert on military manpower, asked a group of recruiters what would most help them: tripling bonuses or enlisting presidential daughter Jenna Bush. The recruiters' choice was unanimous: Jenna Bush.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
The next step of Axel's misadventure came when he heard about a cool "chin-ups" contest in Bellingham, where the prize was a free Xbox. The now 18-year-old Skagit Valley Community College student dragged his tail feathers home uncharacteristically late that night. And, in the morning, Marcia learned the Marines had hosted the event and "then had him out all night, drilling him to join."

A single mom with a meager income, Marcia raised her kids on the farm where, until recently, she grew salad greens for restaurants.

Axel's father, a Marine Corps vet who served in Vietnam, died when Axel was 4.

Clearly the recruiters knew all that and more.

"You don't want to be a burden to your mom," they told him. "Be a man." "Make your father proud." Never mind that, because of his own experience in the service, Marcia says enlistment for his son is the last thing Axel's dad would have wanted.

The next weekend, when Marcia went to Seattle for the Folklife Festival and Axel was home alone, two recruiters showed up at the door.

Axel repeated the family mantra ["No, not now, back off!"], but he was feeling frazzled and worn down by then. The sergeant was friendly but, at the same time, aggressively insistent. This time, when Axel said, "Not interested," the sarge turned surly, snapping, "You're making a big (bleeping) mistake!"

Next thing Axel knew, the same sergeant and another recruiter showed up at the LaConner Brewing Co., the restaurant where Axel works. And before Axel, an older cousin and other co-workers knew or understood what was happening, Axel was whisked away in a car.

"They said we were going somewhere but I didn't know we were going all the way to Seattle," Axel said.

Just a few tests. And so many free opportunities, the recruiters told him.

He could pursue his love of chemistry. He could serve anywhere he chose and leave any time he wanted on an "apathy discharge" if he didn't like it. And he wouldn't have to go to Iraq if he didn't want to.

At about 3:30 in the morning, Alex was awakened in the motel and fed a little something. Twelve hours later, without further sleep or food, he had taken a battery of tests and signed a lot of papers he hadn't gotten a chance to read. "Just formalities," he was told. "Sign here. And here. Nothing to worry about."

from When Marine recruiters go way beyond the call (thanks to [livejournal.com profile] lediva for the link)
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
http://www.leavemychildalone.org/

Thanks to the "No Child Left Behind Act," schools in the US have been required to pass contact information for their students to military recruiters. Parents can "opt out," however. This webpage gives information on how to do so, and how to get involved with efforts to repeal this.

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] lady_babalon for the link
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
At the end of last month, the U.S. Selective Service System issued a report assuring President George W. Bush that it would be ready to implement a draft within 75 days. While stirring up a storm of speculation, this report may actually be the least compelling harbinger of a draft.

Far more dire is the skyrocketing need for troops amid plummeting supply. More than 300,000 of the 482,000 soldiers in the US army are already deployed abroad, predominantly in Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea and the former Yugoslavia. The ratio of two soldiers abroad for every one at home is the opposite of what military strategists say is necessary to maintain a long-term deployment.

It would take 100,000 new troops at home to correct this discrepancy, but the government concedes that new troops are not coming in.

Read more... )

"[Military recruiters] prey on the fact we can barely afford to go to college," Rodriguez said. "What they don't say is it's so hard to get the GI Bill that less than half do."

... Langley and others say parents need to be educated about parts of the "No Child Left Behind Act," which allow military recruiters to access information about students including their home address, telephone number, and extracurricular activities.

Most are unaware that they can prevent this information from being released by submitting an Opt-Out Form signed by parents or students to the school administration.

Organizers also want to publicize the option for military resisters to find safe haven in Canada. During the Vietnam War, over 50,000 Americans went to Canada to avoid the draft. Today however, Canadian law does not allow foreigners to apply for immediate "landed immigrant status"; they must apply outside of the country and wait up to two years or more for a decision. But Gerry Condon, a former Green Beret who refused to fight in Vietnam and who is organizing support for military personnel who have already gone to Canada to avoid fighting in the Iraq war, says that military resisters can avoid the new law by entering Canada as tourists and applying for refugee status.

from An Army of the Unwilling (linked by [livejournal.com profile] antiwar_dot_com)
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
This has been coming up in conversation over the last week or so, so I thought I would poll you, my friends and readers.

[Poll #398277]
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
There's been an increase in the number of ads presenting military service as a rugged adventure. You know, skulking through the forest, scaling a mountain, visiting exotic locales. They never, of course, mention the health hazards of being assigned to a combat zone. Or the hazards of trusting your life and health after your tour of duty is over to a Veterans Administration that is chronically under-budgeted.

If ads for things like cigarettes, alcohol, prescription meds, and possibly someday unhealthy foods, are required to mention the hidden health hazards these things can cause... why shouldn't we require military recruitment efforts to carry similar warnings?
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, [livejournal.com profile] vidicon.

Serve Your Community and the Nation -- Become a Selective Service System Local Board Member

The Selective Service System wants to hear from men and women in the community who might be willing to serve as members of a local draft board.

Profile

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 12:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios