(no subject)
May. 20th, 2010 01:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Somehow I get the feeling that most of the people participating in "Draw Mohammad Day" would be outraged to the point of demanding a boycott or retribution if a hundred thousand Muslims (or people of Muslim cultural heritage) participated in a "Blaspheme Against the Holy Spirit Day" or a "Hang a Cross Upside-Down Day" or the like.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:31 pm (UTC)I'm not participating in it myself, but I have no love of sacred cows or doctrine, so, *shrug*. It's just I see a lot of this "they can dish it but can't take it" syndrome.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 10:53 pm (UTC)The holy spirit is sorta like the immanence of the godhead.
‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ is pretty much the only thing said that is on par with the badness of blaspheming against the holy spirit.
A blaspheme against the holy spirit day would be all too redundant.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:40 pm (UTC)I will amend my post so that my wording is more precise.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 06:22 pm (UTC)Not recently, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-21 04:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 06:05 pm (UTC)Theoretically there wouldn't be one, since the scientific method and worldview is philosophically compatible with any kind of doctrine, and the whole idea behind "Draw Mohammed Day" is to protest doctrinaire inflexibility (and the idea of issuing death threats to people who offend your doctrine).
But that's not to say that there aren't concepts which each generation of atheists treat as if they were doctrine. Even still, it wouldn't have the same impact because there is no atheist equivalent to the fatwa or catechism which theists could poke at.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-21 04:41 am (UTC)Then I can has cheese-burger1
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 07:00 pm (UTC)It's a bit tacky, IMO, but I don't object to the idea of making a statement about the whole death threats thing. The best comment I've seen on the matter came from the Daily Show's Aasif Mandvi. He was like, "Well, to be honest as a Muslim it makes me a little uncomfortable, yeah. But death threats over it are a bit 12th century, don't you think?"
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-21 12:50 am (UTC)I am all for treating Muslims like any other group in the modern world. You know, same rights and stuff. The idea of a group deciding how they should be respected is much more difficult. If a (whatever) group understood modern sensibilities they would be angry if they hadn't been parodied in South Park yet.
I think I would have preferred a blasphemy every religion including atheism in one image day. That might have produced some really creative images.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-21 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-21 04:51 am (UTC)