Date: 2006-09-21 05:38 pm (UTC)
ext_35267: (0)
Since his business contributes to the problem, it's appropriate that he is contributing that kind of money to researching a solution. That's a balanced solution in a non-ideal world.

I rarely travel by air, but I wouldn't want to have rapid air travel eliminated without equally as rapid alternatives already in place. I don't have the vacation time or the personal wealth which would be necessary to take the time off I would need to travel by some other means between NYC and the island of Trinidad, where my sister lives. I only see her once a year, as it is, and those visits are already too short for our tastes, because of those constraints. Without rapid air travel, I and many other people around the world wouldn't be able to visit family and dear friends, or our rare visits would have to be shorter/rarer than they already are.

I don't think rapid air travel needs to be eliminated, but it's obvious alternatives need to be found. People can be encouraged to fly less--use conference calls for out-of-state business meetings, for example--and save flying for truly long flights, where traveling by some other means is not possible with the other real-life constraints they are working with. And while that is going on, money from people like Branson can be used to research alternatives.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 07:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios