In the New Testament, Acts 21: 20-26, there's text to the effect that Jewish are supposed to follow Jewish law, but Gentile Christians are only supposed to "abstain from meat sacrificed to idols and from blood and from what is strangled and from fornication."
In I Corinthians 8 Paul explicitly wrote that there is no deep reason why Christians should avoid eating meat sacrificed to idols, except to avoid upsetting other more sensitive Christians.
So in some fundamentalist churches today, Gentiles who themselves don't follow Jewish law have been known to require converted Jews to do so.
They are probably trying to follow Paul's comment in Galatians 5:2-3 that anyone who is circumsized is a debtor to the whole Law. I wonder what they (fundamentalists) make of the comment that Christ's sacrifice is lost on those who have been circumsized? Hmm, that's a good question for sacred_opinion or challenging_god.
This also explains why conservative Christians believe why Jewish law relating to homosexuality is relevant to Gentiles and that relating to shellfish is not, as homosexuality qualifies as "fornication", i.e., sexual immorality.
Mainly because, I think, of the anti-gay rap in Romans 1.
But I don't think it would occur to the average conservative Gentile Christians to have a problem with rare steaks or check to make sure that the chicken that provided the drumsticks wasn't strangled...
Or to buy their slaves from neighboring nations... I suppose you've seen the wonderful letter to Dr. Laura that's been circulating around the net for years?
Personally I think the prohibition on homosexuality probably originally had to do with discouraging forms of sex that did not produce children within the patriarchal extended family structure, just as many dietary laws appear to have originated for health reasons.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2003-07-16 06:04 am (UTC)In I Corinthians 8 Paul explicitly wrote that there is no deep reason why Christians should avoid eating meat sacrificed to idols, except to avoid upsetting other more sensitive Christians.
So in some fundamentalist churches today, Gentiles who themselves don't follow Jewish law have been known to require converted Jews to do so.
They are probably trying to follow Paul's comment in Galatians 5:2-3 that anyone who is circumsized is a debtor to the whole Law. I wonder what they (fundamentalists) make of the comment that Christ's sacrifice is lost on those who have been circumsized? Hmm, that's a good question for
This also explains why conservative Christians believe why Jewish law relating to homosexuality is relevant to Gentiles and that relating to shellfish is not, as homosexuality qualifies as "fornication", i.e., sexual immorality.
Mainly because, I think, of the anti-gay rap in Romans 1.
But I don't think it would occur to the average conservative Gentile Christians to have a problem with rare steaks or check to make sure that the chicken that provided the drumsticks wasn't strangled...
Or to buy their slaves from neighboring nations... I suppose you've seen the wonderful letter to Dr. Laura that's been circulating around the net for years?
Personally I think the prohibition on homosexuality probably originally had to do with discouraging forms of sex that did not produce children within the patriarchal extended family structure, just as many dietary laws appear to have originated for health reasons.
This mirrors my own thoughts, which are that morals tend to reflect the economic needs of a society. I have an old post about that here which I keep referring to:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sophiaserpentia/40326.html