Mar. 11th, 2004

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
from John Dominic Crossan, The Birth of Christianity, pp.293-298: (italics in original)

"A key axiom in medical anthropology is the dichotomy between two aspects of sickness: disease and illness. Disease refers to a malfunctioning of biological and/or psychological processes, while the term illness refers to the psychological experience and meaning of perceived disease." -- Arthur Kleinman, Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture, p. 72

Scholars working in medical anthropology, comparative ethnomedicine, and the cross-cultural study of "indigenous" healing have proposed a distinction between curing disease and healing illness. ... To further distinguish the two components, we could say that the surgeon is better at curing disease while the shaman is better at healing illness. And that might be all right, of course, if those two processes were always totally separate.

In explaining that distinction to undergraduate students at DePaul University as a background for discussion of Jesus as an indigenous healer, I was usually met with obedient disbelief... until the movie Philadelphia came along.... The protagonist, played by Tom Hanks, had AIDS, a disease caused by a virus that attacks the immune system. This disease may someday be curable.... But the movie was not about the disease, which for Hanks could not be cured, but about the illness, for which healing was possible. The illness involved the man's own reaction to his disease, as well as the reactions of his lover, his family, his employer, his lawyer, and of society at large through the justice system. He was fired by his employer not just because he had AIDS but because he had become infected as a homosexual, and he successfully sued his firm for that discrimination in court. In Philadelphia the distinction between curing disease and healing illness was devastatingly obvious. But so also was the interactive loop between the twin processes of disease and illness. ... That story... showed how one could have successful healing where no successful curing was possible. It also showed how, in other places and times, where curing was not generally possible, healing might still be very important.

... [W]ith some forms of chronic or long-term pain -- especially psychosomatic ailments, where stress or oppression, strain, or exploitation have resulted in somatization or embodiment of the general distress as a specifically localized problem -- supportive companionship can slowly but surely eliminate the disease itself. Rodney Stark, speaking of ancient epidemics, gave the following statistic: "Modern medical experts believe that conscientious nursing without any medications could cut the mortality rate by two-thirds or even more" (89).

... In 1960 I visited the Roman Catholic healing shrines of the Virgin Mary at Lourdes in France and at Fatima in Portugal. In 1965 I visited the pagan healing shrines of the god Asklepios at Epidaurus in Greece and at Pergamum in Turkey. I remember being struck by the general similarity between the ailments involved in stories of healing at all those shrines (as well as by ailments whose reminders could be seen: there were many crutches at the back of the grotto at Lourdes, for example, but no prosthetic limbs or empty coffins).

... I have three conclusions so far. First, society and individual, disease and illness, healing and curing always intertwine together, be it delicately or brutally. Second, supportive companionship and/or religious faith can heal illness and, by so doing, even cure disease, but only in certain cases. ... Third, healing stories tend to increase and become more extraordinary rather than decrease and become more banal.


Edit: in retrospect I have decided to crosspost this entry.
crossposted in my journal and crossposted in [livejournal.com profile] jesusliberation
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Breaking news, mentioned on the friends list (locked entry) --

173 People Killed in Madrid Explosions

MADRID, Spain - Ten terrorist bombs tore through trains and stations along a commuter line at the height of Madrid's morning rush hour Thursday, killing 173 people and wounding at least 600 before this weekend's general elections. Officials blamed Basque separatists for the worst terror attack in Spanish history.

The explosives used in the blasts were a type of dynamite that the ETA Basque separatist group normally uses, the Interior Ministry said following tests.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
First it was acrylamide in potato chips and french fries... now it's diacetyl in popcorn. From [livejournal.com profile] johns_weight:

Microwave popcorn chemicals under scrutiny: Vapors may be linked to lung disease in factory workers

The Environmental Protection Agency is studying the chemicals released into the air when a bag of microwave popcorn is popped or opened.

Exposure to vapors from butter flavoring in microwave popcorn has been linked to a rare lung disease contracted by factory workers in Missouri, Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has said it suspects the chemical diacetyl caused the illnesses.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
from [livejournal.com profile] 14cyclenotes:

Gay Republicans to Run Anti-Amendment Ad

A group of gay Republicans who supported President Bush in 2000 will air a television ad opposing a Bush-backed constitutional amendment that would prohibit gays from marrying.

The 30-second spot by the Log Cabin Republicans shows Vice President Dick Cheney at a debate four years ago saying, "People should be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to enter into." The ad begins Thursday in several states. The vice president also says: "I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area." The words "We agree" then flash on the screen.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
Music survey from [livejournal.com profile] pouk23

Elvis or Jerry Lee Lewis? Close one, but gotta go with Elvis.
The Beatles or The Rolling Stones? The Beatles. The Stones... never did much for me. Sorry.
John Lennon or Paul McCartney? Lennon. No-brainer on that one for me.
Mick Jagger or Keith Richards? I don't have much of an affinity for either one, but I'll pick Jagger by a nose.
The Kinks or The Yardbirds? The Kinks. Ray Davies rules. (Incidentally, he was shot in the leg here in New Orleans a few days into January...)
The Doors or The Byrds? The Doors. Come on: "The End" vs. "Mr. Tambourine Man"?
Keith Moon or John Bonham? Keith Moon. (And not just because of his wardrobe.)
Led Zeppelin or Black Sabbath? Sabbath.
The Sex Pistols or The Ramones? Sex Pistols.
Iron Maiden or Metallica? early Iron Maiden.
Joy Division or New Order? New Order. (My 15-year-old self is screaming in protest.)
The Smiths or The Cure? The Cure.
Billy Idol or Jon Bon Jovi? Billy Idol. (Bon Jovi!?)
Eddie Van Halen or David Lee Roth? Uh... the talented one (Eddie Van Halen)
Oasis or U2? U2.
Nirvana or Pearl Jam? Nirvana.
Fiona Apple or Tori Amos? Fiona Apple. (Sorry. Send complaints, screaming to up@yours.com)
Nine Inch Nails or Korn? Nine Inch Nails.
Coldplay or Radiohead? No preference.
Suede or Pulp? Uh... this it where it starts costing me cool points. ("That's okay, Sabrina, we already knew you were an uncool nerd.")
Good Charlotte or Sum 41?
The Darkness or Buster?

Profile

sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 12:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios