(no subject)

Darn it, seraphimsigrist, must you always write things that encourage me to think?

just the thought that if God doesn't act then we
sure don't.

As I was drifting off to sleep last night it occurred to me that what you described here is a notion of God that is in many ways the mirror image of my own -- via positiva to my via negativa.

The personal God, who watches and acts, is a positive God of faith. One must take an active leap of faith to believe in this God.

The impersonal God, who resides in repose and passively influences the cosmos, is a negative God of understanding. One can arrive at this idea of God by seeking repose and by observing the cosmos and feeling subsequently an absence of presence.

Edit: This comment from Anthony De Mello in my in-box this morning is appropriate:

"Make a clean break with your past and you will be Enlightened," said the Master.

"I am doing that by degrees."

"Growth is achieved by degrees. Enlightenment is instantaneous."

Later he said, "Take the leap! You cannot cross a chasm in little jumps."

Extra points if you can identify the reference.

I can't shake the sudden feeling that George W. Bush is Ferris F. Freemont.

(no subject)

Idealism says, we live in the best of all possible worlds.
Pragmatism says, sure, except for that 'pain and suffering' thing.

Idealism says, we must be the change we wish to see in the world.
Pragmatism says, if you don't have money, guns, or a pretty face, go away.

Idealism says, think globally, act locally.
Pragmatism says, is that your idea of pragmatism?

Idealism says, we resolve to uphold the inherent dignity and worth of every human being.
Pragmatism says, what, criminals and politicians too?

Idealism says, always have faith in human nature.
Pragmatism says, damn, it *does* say "MARK" on your forehead.

Idealism says, justice is blind.
Pragmatism says, we do indeed have the best justice system money can buy.