I think "cool" is a perfectly acceptable response, in light of the original entry. :)
And it's sweet of you to offer to give me credit, but that does seem to be defeating the purpose... the intention when talking about God-concepts is really that it's from yourself. To see labels as possessions rather than just means of communication... well, I'm not sure about that whole dynamic or where I fit into it. Besides, I borrowed the term from another source, although my reasons for using it are personal to me and may differ from the reasons of the people I adopted it from.
Vulgar shmulgar... one man's vulgar is another man's expression of a beautiful gift. Or woman's, for that matter. Maybe I should care more about people getting offended. But I can't stop them.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2003-03-21 11:30 am (UTC)And it's sweet of you to offer to give me credit, but that does seem to be defeating the purpose... the intention when talking about God-concepts is really that it's from yourself. To see labels as possessions rather than just means of communication... well, I'm not sure about that whole dynamic or where I fit into it. Besides, I borrowed the term from another source, although my reasons for using it are personal to me and may differ from the reasons of the people I adopted it from.
Vulgar shmulgar... one man's vulgar is another man's expression of a beautiful gift. Or woman's, for that matter. Maybe I should care more about people getting offended. But I can't stop them.