sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia ([personal profile] sophiaserpentia) wrote2006-09-06 01:11 pm

(no subject)

Sometimes i'm just absolutely stunned by the depths to which hatred of women can sink. And i'm dismayed when i see how often the primary excuse is "defending our religious traditions."

Maybe it's the peace, love, and compassion speaking, but no principle is worth defending if it creates injustice.

Lawmakers from a coalition of six Islamic groups threatened on Tuesday to vacate their parliamentary seats if Pakistan's government changes a rape law criticized by human rights activists.

... Under the current law, approved by a former military dictator in 1979, prosecuting a rape case requires testimony from four witnesses, making punishment almost impossible because such attacks are rarely public. A woman who claims she was raped but fails to prove her case can be convicted of adultery, punishable by death.

Maulana Fazalur Rahman, a leader of the Islamic coalition, said Tuesday that lawmakers in his group would vacate their seats in the National Assembly if the government tries to get the assembly's approval to change the law.

"We will render every sacrifice for the protection of the Shariah (traditional Islamic) laws," he said at a news conference.

However, the ruling Pakistan Muslim Party — which has a majority in the assembly — has praised Musharraf for taking steps to amend the law and end the four-witness requirement.

from Rape law rankles some Pakistan lawmakers

[identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com 2006-09-06 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Far be it from me to lament the resignation of any fundamentalist from any government anywhere. But as i understand it there might be some concern that such a move could destabilize the whole government. (A bad thing? I'm feeling cynical today so i'll say maybe not -- sometimes a governmental void gives the citizens a chance to shine, as happened in Argentina -- although OTOH governmental collapse is the kind of thing the Taliban live for.)