sophiaserpentia (
sophiaserpentia) wrote2006-05-19 03:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
I laughed out loud, but my god, these people are serious!
"Carbon dioxide: they call it pollution; we call it life!"
ineffabelle commented on my post the other day to say that the pre-pregnant thing sounded 'cartoonishly fascistic.' I have to say, this tops it. It is as duplicitous and Orwellian as anything i can possibly imagine.
The only consolation i have is that maybe this is the last gasp of greed before people start thinking and acting sensibly about global warming.
"Carbon dioxide: they call it pollution; we call it life!"
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The only consolation i have is that maybe this is the last gasp of greed before people start thinking and acting sensibly about global warming.
no subject
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
**HEADDESK**
I'm going to my happy place now, I'm going to my happy place now, LALALALALALALALALA
That is beyond twisted.
no subject
no subject
Ow. My brain hurts now.
no subject
But, yes, that's exactly the thing here. This is so freakin' cartoonish in its lack of context. Besides, i think a legitimate case can be made that they're actually lying. No one is suggesting we label carbon dioxide a pollutant, but that we restrict CO2 emissions. BIG difference, and considering that the TV stations wouldn't run the UCC's ads last year because they were "controversial," i think we need to take any TV station to task if they play this ad.
no subject
...No, I'd cry.
no subject
no subject
The fact that this basic scientific concept is not even understood by "us" masses makes me shudder.
no subject
no subject
It makes it even more demented when your partner is studying life and biological sciences. She used a newspaper link to poke fun at the conservatives on her University Forum.