sophiaserpentia (
sophiaserpentia) wrote2003-05-09 07:44 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
The comments on my poll of yesterday have been extremely thought-provoking -- especially those of
lady_babalon and that of
akaiyume. Thank you!
I wanted to summarize some of my realizations on this subject since yesterday and sum things up a bit from comments that I made on this thread and elsewhere.
The connection between BDSM and yoga (and, we should perhaps add, martial arts) seemed to be immediately obvious to some, while non-existent to others. This may be because people who practice BDSM derive a wide range of results from it. Some see it mostly or entirely as a means of deriving physical pleasure. Others, such as myself, see it as much more than that -- it provides for us physical, emotional, and even spiritual pleasure.
One parallel that I mentioned to
cruelly_kind is between the redemption offered by worshipping a god or goddess, who redeems by "forgiving sins" or "clearing karma"... and the karmic release one finds in offering submissive service. Both create a "karma-safe" realm in which the worshipper/submissive is free to grow and explore.
Much of BDSM is of course tied into the way the human animal works; the physique, the breath, the chemical side of the emotions, the wiring of neurons, and so forth. But yoga, qigong, and perhaps martial arts (which I do not have first hand experience of) are also means of tying in the workings of the human animal with subtler aspects of existence. In my experience these are more than simply activities that work on the same parts of the human body; they yielded very similar results. For me, being tied up and flogged, being dominated and pressed into service, were profoundly spiritual experiences. I also had spiritual insights from even a single experience of being dominant.
Another possible reason for the resistance is that people do not want to see the spiritual as tied so innately to the workings of the flesh. Certainly my chosen tradition of Gnosticism is very disparaging in this regard. Yet, karma, as experienced through the workings (and failings) of flesh, provide the only means by which we learn.
Throughout this topic I have been thinking of John of the Cross, who was able to grow spiritually from his experiences of torture at the hands of the Carmelites. He wrote, in "The Dark Night of the Soul":
2. In darkness, and secure,
by the secret ladder, disguised,
- ah, the sheer grace! -
in darkness and concealment,
my house being now all stilled.
3. On that glad night,
in secret, for no one saw me,
nor did I look at anything,
with no other light or guide
than the one that burned in my heart.
4. This guided me
more surely than the light of noon
to where he was awaiting me
- him I knew so well -
there in a place where no one appeared.
translated by Kieran Kavanaugh, OCD, and Otilio Rodriguez, OCD, revised edition (1991).
Perhaps, too, it is simply because I am trained as a mathematician to find patterns that aren't immediately obvious; this might lead me to readily conjecture patterns that don't exist.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I wanted to summarize some of my realizations on this subject since yesterday and sum things up a bit from comments that I made on this thread and elsewhere.
The connection between BDSM and yoga (and, we should perhaps add, martial arts) seemed to be immediately obvious to some, while non-existent to others. This may be because people who practice BDSM derive a wide range of results from it. Some see it mostly or entirely as a means of deriving physical pleasure. Others, such as myself, see it as much more than that -- it provides for us physical, emotional, and even spiritual pleasure.
One parallel that I mentioned to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Much of BDSM is of course tied into the way the human animal works; the physique, the breath, the chemical side of the emotions, the wiring of neurons, and so forth. But yoga, qigong, and perhaps martial arts (which I do not have first hand experience of) are also means of tying in the workings of the human animal with subtler aspects of existence. In my experience these are more than simply activities that work on the same parts of the human body; they yielded very similar results. For me, being tied up and flogged, being dominated and pressed into service, were profoundly spiritual experiences. I also had spiritual insights from even a single experience of being dominant.
Another possible reason for the resistance is that people do not want to see the spiritual as tied so innately to the workings of the flesh. Certainly my chosen tradition of Gnosticism is very disparaging in this regard. Yet, karma, as experienced through the workings (and failings) of flesh, provide the only means by which we learn.
Throughout this topic I have been thinking of John of the Cross, who was able to grow spiritually from his experiences of torture at the hands of the Carmelites. He wrote, in "The Dark Night of the Soul":
2. In darkness, and secure,
by the secret ladder, disguised,
- ah, the sheer grace! -
in darkness and concealment,
my house being now all stilled.
3. On that glad night,
in secret, for no one saw me,
nor did I look at anything,
with no other light or guide
than the one that burned in my heart.
4. This guided me
more surely than the light of noon
to where he was awaiting me
- him I knew so well -
there in a place where no one appeared.
translated by Kieran Kavanaugh, OCD, and Otilio Rodriguez, OCD, revised edition (1991).
Perhaps, too, it is simply because I am trained as a mathematician to find patterns that aren't immediately obvious; this might lead me to readily conjecture patterns that don't exist.
no subject
no subject
The funny thing about Nietzsche
"Nietzsche explicitly refused to develop a philosophical system, suggesting that individual, seemingly disconnected analyses, expressed in short, well-written aphorisms, are more honest and insightful than lengthy, scholarly treatises which tend to bend everything to fit a pre-conceived theory. (Thus, his writings may sometimes be self-contradictory. The way to read Nietzsche is not to figure out how the many things he wrote can be fitted into one abstract formula, a procedure that would be more appropriate for such philosophers as Plato or Kant, but to consider every one of his pieces as a thought experiment which succeeds or fails on its own.)"
ideas about what yoga and BDSM does
Re: ideas about what yoga and BDSM does
Things like Yoga, Qigong, BDSM, martial arts, and so on, defy the dualistic flesh/spirit split. They point to an interesting interplay -- to learn spiritually, we must live and experience as creatures of flesh. Flesh enables just as it hinders that spiritual growth. The key to making the interplay a constructive rather than destructive one is discipline.
The spirit and the flesh
Might as well say that only yin is good, and yang is evil.
But it's true that some people fear the spiritual, just as others fear the flesh.
Re: The spirit and the flesh
There are no short-cuts for discipline.
For me the spirit/flesh dissonance/harmony is a subject of constant inspection because I am transgendered. From the very start I felt at least partially alien to my own flesh, perhaps moreso than the average person.
Re: The spirit and the flesh
I'm suddenly thinking about the difference between karate and aikido (neither of which I know a lot about *g*).
In karate, you reject the attack and the attacker.
In aikido, you embrace the attack and the attacker, and make his energy your own.
So, in spiritual aikido, we do not deny the demands of the flesh, we accept them, but put them to use. This is the principle behind much of Tantric teaching, which also calls for the discipline of which you wrote.
And, interestingly, following Tantra for spiritual reasons has some mind-boggling fleshly benefits.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Your opinion? Or the opinion of others? Apparently, not yours, so that we are back to my preceding question.
no subject
So, when people say "BDSM is a fleshly/sensual pursuit" we are inclined to believe them until we have reason to believe otherwise -- until we try it and that doesn't match our own perceptions.
no subject
I have an ancient essay on bdsm as Thelemic practice that can be found at http://www.caoto.org
no subject
no subject
The way you are thinking is forcing me to examine all of my preconceptions. This is a GOOD thing. I do not like to be complacent in my thoughts and conclusions, ever. So keep it up. :)
I am not sure that I understand how one can grow/explore in a "karma-safe" realm.
Perhaps I should try to explain what I mean by this. Whatever we do, own, become, or even are, ties us inextricably deeper into the "warp and woof" of the fabric of existence. So by doing or even just by existing we are drawn further away from the state of repose which (it seems to me) is the origin and destination of all things. (I state this without placing a value judgment on whether it is "good" or "bad" to be deeply embroiled in the warp and woof of reality.)
But it seems to me that real growth and exploration have to happen under whatever state/realm is normative for the individual in question.
Hmm... I think I know what you mean by this... but it seems to me that what causes us to grow, adapt, and change, is being far from our state of equilibrium. This tends to come at a high cost, though. So what I mean by a "karma-safe realm" is that BDSM is a controlled environment that allows us to experience things far from equilibrium in a way that, if done right, involves a lower karmic cost.
A consentual rape scene, for example, does not involve the same karmic cost as an actual rape.