sophiaserpentia: (Default)
2006-05-15 11:35 am

a woman speaks, and the world trembles with rage

Saturday night, [livejournal.com profile] lady_babalon and i went to see Deepa Mehta's film Water. It's been consuming our conversations and emotions ever since, and two days later, i still can't stop thinking about it.

Before the opening credits, we see seven-year-old Chuyia being asked by her father if she remembers being married. She cannot. Her husband died, he tells her. She's now a widow, and is required to live a life of ascetic denial at an ashram for widows, who are considered to be only half-alive and essentially outcaste.

Mehta tried to make this film in India for five years. Several attempts to make the film were prevented by violent protests, arson, death threats, and political posturing.

The day before filming was due to begin, the crew was informed that there were a few complications with gaining location permits. The following day we were greeted with the news that 2,000 protesters had stormed the ghats, destroying the main film set, burning and throwing it into the holy river. Protesters burnt effigies of Deepa Mehta, and threats to her life began.

... "Breaking up the sets was far too mild an act, the people involved with the film should have been beaten black and blue. They come with foreign money to make a film which shows India in poor light because that is what sells in the west. The west refuses to acknowledge our achievements in any sphere, but is only interested in our snake charmers and child brides. And people like Deepa Mehta pander to them."

from The Politics of Deepa Mehta's Water


Opposition to this project was so severe that Mehta had to film in Sri Lanka under a phony title.

Mehta did not make a movie about how evil India is. Mehta is indeed very critical of Hindu fundamentalism, but in Mehta's analysis, the mistreatment of widows in India is not, at heart, about flaws we find only in Indian culture or religion. As she sees it, it is about economics and male privilege. Families use ancient beliefs about widows as an excuse to clear up some space in the family home and feed one less person. "Disguised as religion, it's just about money." Gender inequity is also blatantly obvious. Widows in India constitute a large pool of desperate, starving women (by my estimate, they make up 3-4% of the population) and many of them are prostituted. Their situation is so dire that men who rent their bodies can tell themselves they are doing these women a kindness.

She also portrays the solution to the problem as coming from within Indian thought and culture, symbolized by talk throughout the film about Mohandas Gandhi and his movement to reform the caste system. His words are quoted and tut-tutted by people along the chain of privilege who stand to lose their bit of benefit if widows are actually liberated.

(It also bears pointing out that, judging from the energy spent protesting feminism, talking about the mistreatment of women appears to be a bigger crime than, you know, actually mistreating women.)
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
2004-12-05 10:51 am

Mohini, transgendered enchantress of Hindu myth, with an excerpt from the Mahabharata

There is a shining mountain named Meru, an unsurpassed mass of energy; its blazing golden peaks outshine even the light of the sun. ... The gods, who dwell in heaven and are of great vigour, rich in ascetic powers, came together, mounted its plateau, and sat there to take counsel in order to obtain the ambrosia [amrit].

While the gods were thinking and conferring together, the god Narayana (Vishnu) said to Brahma, "Let the gods and demons churn the ocean which is like a churning pot, and when the great ocean is churned there will be ambrosia, and you will also obtain the herbs and gems."

... The tremendous mountain named Mandara is adorned with mountain peaks like pointed clouds; it is covered with a net of vines, it rings with the song of many birds, and it is crowded with tusked animals. ... The potent serpent Ananta arose at Brahma's behest and was instructed by Narayana in the task. Then the mighty Ananta forcibly uprooted that king of mountains with all its forests and forest-dwellers, and the gods went with the mountain to the ocean and said to him, "We will churn your water to obtain ambrosia."

... The gods and demons then said to the king of tortoises, the supreme tortoise, "You are the one suited to be the resting place for this mountain." The tortoise agreed, and Indra placed the tip of the mountain on his back, fastening it tightly.

They made Mandara the churning-stick and the serpent Vasuki the cord, and they began to churn the ocean, the treasure of waters, for ambrosia. The gods acted together with the demons, for they all wished for the ambrosia. The great demons grasped one end of the king of serpents, and all the gods held him by the tail.


During the churning of the ocean a number of events took place before

...at last, the god Dhanvantari [the physician-god] came forth [from the ocean] incarnate, holding a white pot in which the ambrosia was contained. When the demons saw this marvel they let out a great roar for the ambrosia, each crying, "It is mine!"

Then the lord Narayana took the form of Mohini, a magic illusion of the marvelous body of a woman, and he went to the demons. As their minds were bewitched, they gave the ambrosia to him in his female form, for all the demons had their hearts set on her. The goddess who was made of the illusion wrought by Narayana held the bowl and gave it to the gods to drink, but although the demons were seated in a row she did not give it to them to drink.


Afterwards, of course, the demons were so enraged that they attacked, and a great battle ensued. But the gods, now having the benefit of the ambrosia's power, were able to prevail and prevent the demons from consuming any of the amrit.

This tale contains a great deal of alchemical and tantric symbolism, and in my opinion it is one of the most important esoteric formulations ever given.

The serpent around the mountain-as-rod is a classic caduceus image, a parallel to the image of the uncoiling serpent of Kundalini awakening. The mountain being churned in the ocean (as archetypal a feminine symbol as there has ever been) is a not-very-veiled rendition of sacred sex -- especially considering the numerous references in this myth to milk, or to the white foam of the ocean, or other white foamy products of the churning. Thus the myth has a very important tantric reading -- but that is not, in my mind, the most important element of the myth's meaning. It is, on many levels beyond this, a myth about the uniting of opposites.

Exciting the limbic system through Dervish whirling, esoteric initiation, drumming and dancing, solemn ceremony, flaggelation, or tantric sex, causes the sympathetic nervous system to overflow, activating simultaneously the parasympathetic nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system is what causes bodily excitation -- sweat, adrenaline, heavy breath, heightened awareness; while the parasympathetic nervous system is what causes bodily calm -- slower breath and heart rate, a sense of calm, muscular stillness. When both systems are active at once, one feels the sensation of awe -- the profound state of mystical awareness.

It's unclear whether the ancient Hindu myth-makers could have been so aware of their inner life that they recognized awe as the combination of calm and excitation. They could, however, have observed the experience of becoming "one with the universe," which is often shown mythologically as the uniting of opposites. What is actually going on here, is that mystical experiece often involves the quietening of the spatial orientation center of the brain. Neurologists have seen this occuring in conjunction with the subjective experience of "mystical union."

In this myth the uniting of opposites takes two forms: the gods and demons overcoming their differences temporarily to work together towards a common goal -- and the union of male and female in the body of Mohini, the transgendered enchantress.

As it was encoded in the Gospel of Thomas:
Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female... then will you enter the kingdom."


Mohini serves as the High Priestess, the Camel who Crosses the Abyss, because it is she who determines who is worthy to receive the amrit, the ambrosia that confers immortality.

Though in the excerpt above her femininity is described as an "illusion," this is misleading because in another myth, Mohini bears a child to Shiva -- the androgynous Ayyappan, who could be compared to Hermaphrodite of Greek myth.

For these reasons, I consider her to be one of the most potent symbols of gnosis ever offered.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
2003-05-08 08:51 am

(no subject)

[livejournal.com profile] aarondarling requested more about the Spirit from the Bhagavad-Gita. Here is a passage that seems to exemplify the Gita's teaching on this subject.

[Bhagavad-Gita 6:20] When the mind is resting in the stillness of the prayer of Yoga [yoga-sevaya, the science of union], and by the grace of the Spirit [atmana] sees the Spirit and therein finds fulfillment;
[21] then the seeker knows the joy of Eternity: a vision seen by reason far beyond what senses can see. He abides therein and moves not from Truth.
[22] He has found joy and Truth, a vision for him supreme. He is therein steady: the greatest pain moves him not.
(trans. Juan Mascaro)

To verse 20, compare:
[Matthew 6:6] But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

To verse 21, compare:
[I Corinthians 2:9] As it is written: "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him"
[10] --but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit.

[Acts 2:1] When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place.
[2] Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting.
[3] They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them.

Edit: I should comment here on the mention of grace in verse 20 above. In the esoteric tradition it is indicated that the experience of union depends upon two conditions: the readiness of the aspirant, and the descent of grace. The aspirant signals readiness by cultivating control of breath and posture and by focusing attention on the sahasrara or crown of the head (possibly the "upstairs room" mentioned in Acts 1:13?).

This readiness however does not guarantee the descent of grace, as anyone who has spent time in contemplative prayer or meditation will tell you, it is possible to do this for months or years without any result resembling dhyana or samadhi. Therefore the experience of union is described always as a revelation.
sophiaserpentia: (Default)
2003-05-07 09:11 am

(no subject)

In the Bhagavad-Gita Krishna describes an attitude towards the Vedas very similar to that of Paul towards the Law of Moses.

Sacred action (karma) is described in the Vedas and these come from the Eternal, and therefore is the Eternal everpresent in a sacrifice. Thus was the Wheel of the Law set in motion, and that man lives indeed in vain who in a sinful life of pleasures helps not in its revolutions. But the man who has found the joy of the Spirit (atma-ratihh) and in the Spirit has satisfaction, who in the Spirit has found his peace, that man is beyond the law of action. He is beyond what is done and what is not done, and in all his works he is beyond the help of mortal beings. Bhagavad-Gita 3:15-17, trans. Juan Mascaro


Compare this to:

So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God. For when we were controlled by the sinful nature, the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death. But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code. Romans 7:4-6, NIV


Both passages can be read in light of the Gnostic psychic/pneumatic distinction to read thus: religious codes are good as far as they go, in maintaining the social harmony and encouraging people to live better lives. But they do not represent the pinnacle of human spiritual awareness; direct spiritual awareness supercedes the religious codes, as one who always acts from compassion does no wrong.