sophiaserpentia: (Default)
sophiaserpentia ([personal profile] sophiaserpentia) wrote2009-08-31 12:52 pm

the revolutionary gnosis

This post brought to you by the Thievery Corporation, who started their latest album Radio Retaliation with "Sound the Alarm," a collaboration with Sleepy Wonder:

Sound the alarm, order the attack
Selassie I soldiers beat Babylon back.


There's a lot of meaning in that beyond the historical reference, though we can start there. In 1928, Ras Tafari Makonnen was crowned King of Ethiopia and he assumed the royal name Haile Selassie I. Ethiopia was then one of only two independent nations in Africa, and many in Africa and the African diaspora saw the crowning of Selassie I as representing African resistance to the European colonial scheme.

In 1935 Benito Mussolini, who aspired to be the ruler of a new Roman Empire, invaded Ethiopia. It's hard to think of this as a "war"; Italian casualties were somewhere between 355 and 500, while Ethiopian casualties were in the order of 275,000. The colonial powers of Europe approved and recognized the occupation and annexation of Ethiopia in 1936 by the Italian Empire. Selassie I, in exile in England, warned Europe: "It is us today. It will be you tomorrow." Three years later saw the start of World War Two; and in 1941 British and Free French forces helped Ethopian troops liberate Ethiopia.

On one level the song is about these historical events, and on another level it is about the larger context of Africa shaking off the colonial powers. It also echoes the present day anti-neo-colonialist movement.

On yet another level, the song is a profession of the Rastafari worldview. "Babylon" is a generic name for empire (taken from those parts of Jewish scripture written after forced exile in Babylon) in a way that blends political reality with religious worldview. In this view all empires are the same; and all emperors, while they may have conflicts with one another, recognize each other as the powers that control the world's businesses, governments, and institutions.

Because my awareness of this worldview started with my investigations of ancient middle eastern Gnosticism, I still think of this as the gnostic view of political reality: worldly rulers are seen as shadows of demigod archons, whose empire over the earth is all-reaching; the faces may change, emperors may be deposed, but the numinous nature of Empire casts a permanent shadow on the human soul, and dominance will always resurface. Resistance against Empire is therefore not just political rebellion, but a challenge to the very concept of fate and to the notion that human nature is forevermore shaped by the desire to dominate others by force when possible. But this view is more than "gnostic": it the response of the religious spirit to the totality of economic and hegemonic domination that exists in the human sphere.

The visage on the album's cover is that of Subcomandante Marcos, the leader of the EZLN, and I bring this up to point out that while the song casts resistance to Empire in militaristic terms, the EZLN has actually turned away from the militaristic approach. This is good and necessary because, as the Revolution is beginning to understand, there is no way to defeat the Empire by matching the Empire's violence. When you take up arms "against" the Empire, you become of it, because Empire is rooted in the power you gain by pointing a weapon. For a graphic illustration of this point, I recommend Karin Badt's illuminating interview with a former FARC guerilla who was recruited as a young girl.

[identity profile] ankh-f-n-khonsu.livejournal.com 2009-08-31 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Intriguing post. If you aren't registered/lack the inclination, do you mind if it gets reposted at digimob.tk?

[identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com 2009-08-31 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not inclined to repost anywhere else, but I don't object if someone else does (preferably with a link back to this post).

[identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com 2009-08-31 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
BTW I'd meant to include some allusion to Philip K. Dick's proclamation that "the Empire never ended" but the post was getting long enough as it was...

[identity profile] azaz-al.livejournal.com 2009-08-31 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
On another level the Rastafarian railing against "Babylon" (and to a certain extent, the Jewish) is a railing against "paganism", the goddess, and polytheism.

Babylon - now Iraq - aka Persia, was probably the oldest civilization in the world. Civilization and the city-state arose for a reason. People found art, beauty, and safety in the cities; prosperity, less hunger, and order to protect themselves against a natural world that is not the kind sweet giving all-loving mother modern people sometimes seem to want to believe.

[identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com 2009-08-31 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
*nods* The city-state was a mixed blessing; art, beauty, and safety, but at the price of becoming a servant of the city-state. On the whole most people choose to accept the authority of the state needed for cities to exist, rather than moving to the wilderness to rebel against it. That is, though, what many of the Gnostics did: they moved to compounds out in wilderness and railed against the evils of civilization.

But you bring up a second important point, that a lot of the time revolutionary thinking tends all to often to have a misogynistic flavor about it. It's a fairly prominent point of obvious contention among the Gnostics, as well. Some of their writings appear to have been by women; but most of the surviving writings were virulently misogynistic. I need to do some thinking about this.

[identity profile] azaz-al.livejournal.com 2009-08-31 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
*nods* A lot of things romanticized as "freedom" - the wild west, for example, or "liberated" Iraq over Saddam Hussein's "dictatorship" end up being much worse for women than the "tyrannical" civilization they are escaping/rebelling/overthrowing. Many revolutionaries, religious and otherwise, rail against the "decadence" and "excess" of civilization which is in part deserved denouncements of corruption and injustice but also heavily weighted towards denouncing the "terrible" results of the freedom of women, gays or other sexual libertarians, and shows a strong distrust of the learned and of artists.