sophiaserpentia (
sophiaserpentia) wrote2003-03-19 10:31 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ikthys
Carl Jung suggested the fish as the perfect symbol for the emergent, individuated self -- the person of perfect gnosis. Another suggestion is that the fish represents unreconciled elements of the unconconsious, bits of the mind not connected to our sense of self that appear and disappear beneath the murky waters of dreams and unawareness.
Is that why the fish has suddenly made an appearance as the perfect harbinger of doom? Why are people so quick to believe in a talking fish when so many obvious technological explanations for a hoax come to mind?
Is that why the fish has suddenly made an appearance as the perfect harbinger of doom? Why are people so quick to believe in a talking fish when so many obvious technological explanations for a hoax come to mind?
no subject
He *is* a pretty cool guy (she says, deliberately misconstruing your words)
I think the talking fish story is HYSTERICAL!!! Salmon proclaiming the end is nigh! Precognitive gefilte fish! Amen!!!
no subject
no subject
no subject
I HATE YOU BOTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no subject
no subject
Re:
no subject
no subject
(could ramble for a while about those associations but i'm sure you know them.)
as for the fish story, technological explanations for the hoax never even crossed my mind. i figured it was just a myth, and was much more interested in the fact that it got covered by the BBC (and cracked me up.) however i also believe that there is a chance that it could be 'true,' that is, as experienced by the participants, as there isn't any other kind of 'true,' and in this world which is getting more and more absurd and fucked by the second, its kind of fitting, don't you think? for a fish to proclaim our immanent demise in hebrew?