ext_98055 ([identity profile] drooling-ferret.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] sophiaserpentia 2009-07-24 04:18 pm (UTC)

As opposed to genderqueer (used as an umbrella for a wide range of things include transness?), this makes sense, and I may start using it in the appropriate contexts, actually.

Not sure it sits well as a balancing term to trans* in general, which seemed like the overall issue. From reading on this I see people who identify as genderqueer and not trans- anything, and transfolk who do not identify at all with 'genderqueer', but I am sure I have not has as broad an exposure as you, so I'd like to know your impression of that.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting