ext_44983 ([identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] sophiaserpentia 2008-04-30 04:57 pm (UTC)

What's wrong with just using "homosexual" as a descriptor?

Well, it's not very catchy, is it? Plus it's very clinical sounding. And it doesn't really solve the underlying problem, in that the term "homosexual woman" may be a description for who it is that gay women are, but it's not really a name.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting