ext_15805 (
glamwhorebunni.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
sophiaserpentia
2006-04-07 05:54 pm (UTC)
no subject
I heard 220 to 340 AD...
But that's the date of the actual physical object. It might not have been written then, it could be written earlier (or be a translation of an earlier text).
(
14 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
But that's the date of the actual physical object. It might not have been written then, it could be written earlier (or be a translation of an earlier text).