My point is that the proof that placing children with homosexual parents is not detrimental that the state has used to justify its decision has been shown to be flawed. The state felt that their decision needed to be justified with research, and thus made its decision contingent on research supporting its course of action. If the research isn't as solid as it was purported to be, and the state has already operated on the presumption that solid research justified the decision, then the decision needs to be revisted.