The only resrictions on divorce which I am aware of in the Mosaic Law are in Deuteronomy 22, which assert that a man who fornicates with or rapes an unmarried woman must take her as his wife and may not divorce her ever.
Outside of that, I can find no circumstances under which a man is forbidden, or even discouraged, from divorcing his wife. Unless he "defiled" her before their marriage, he can according to the Mosaic Law divorce her more or less at will, thereby removing himself from the obligation to provide for her.
That is more liberal than even the code we have today in the US, under which many men are required by the courts to provide in part for their ex-wives and children. Until the advent of "no fault" divorce, men were required to allege some kind of misconduct in order to be granted a divorce; again, that code is more restrictive than the Mosaic Law.
no subject
Outside of that, I can find no circumstances under which a man is forbidden, or even discouraged, from divorcing his wife. Unless he "defiled" her before their marriage, he can according to the Mosaic Law divorce her more or less at will, thereby removing himself from the obligation to provide for her.
That is more liberal than even the code we have today in the US, under which many men are required by the courts to provide in part for their ex-wives and children. Until the advent of "no fault" divorce, men were required to allege some kind of misconduct in order to be granted a divorce; again, that code is more restrictive than the Mosaic Law.