(no subject)

[sophiaserpentia]

linked by lady_babalon:

Judge Says Calif. Can't Ban Gay Marriage

Okay, but I'm going to look at the dark cloud around this silver lining, because

A pair of bills pending before the California Legislature would put a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage on the November ballot. If California voters approve such an amendment, as those in 13 other states did last year, that would put the issue out of the control of lawmakers and the courts.

Hey, while you're at it, it's not too late to add amendments to your state constitution making interracial marriage illegal too. Because the majority ALWAYS votes in the best interests of the minority, even when the minority doesn't know what's good for themselves.

After all, this is a kind of marriage of which Christian leaders and politicans said (among many nasty things):

• it's wrong "simply because natural instinct revolts at it as wrong."


• it would result in "a degraded and ignoble population incapable of moral and intellectual development."


• it is "abominable" and would "pollute" America if allowed.


• it must be banned to prevent "traditional marriage from being contaminated by the recognition of relationships that are physically and mentally inferior," and entered into by "the dregs of society.

Comments

[evilhenchcat.livejournal.com]

it must be banned to prevent "traditional marriage from being contaminated by the recognition of relationships that are physically and mentally inferior," and entered into by "the dregs of society.

Does that include Mrs. Brittany Spears and Mr. Kevin "I don't need no stinkin' job" Federline? Cuz if anyone represents the dregs of society and the mentally inferior, I think they win hands down.