maybe Im missing something but, well and
taking the intention of the post to be reflexively
critical, which also can be wrong, but are
not small nuclear weapons a good idea in some
ways compared to large ones?
it would certainly be a specific sort of situation
where a conventional weapon would not work and
a large nuclear weapon not needed, but I should
think that of situations where conventional weapons
were not sufficient there could easily be one where
a weapon producing little radioactivity and limited
destruction could be enough and would it not be nice
to have that option?
of course then there comes the question of wisdom in
use...and yet just on one hand of what could be
a judgement in another way...every weapon from the
bow and arrow on requires that...
this not at all as arguing about it but because
it seems an interesting question in some way.
about which also probably I am ill qualified to have
an opinion, but who is?
+Seraphim.